Website owner: James Miller
Linear functional. Matrix representation. Dual space, conjugate space, adjoint space. Basis for dual space. Annihilator. Transpose of a linear mapping.
Def. Functional. Let V be an abstract vector space over a field F. A functional T is a function T:V → F that assigns a number from field F to each vector x ε V.
Def. Linear functional. A functional T is linear if
T(av1 + bv2) = aTv1 + bTv2
for all vectors v1 and v2 and scalars a and b.
Examples.
1. Let V be the vector space of polynomials in t over R, the field of reals. Let T:V → R be the integral operator defined by
This integral effects a linear mapping from the space of polynomials to the field of reals and hence T is a linear functional.
2. Let V be the vector space of n-square matrices over F. Let T:V → R be the trace mapping
T(A) = a11 + a22 + .... + ann
where matrix A = (aij). That is, T assigns to a matrix A the sum of its diagonal elements. This mapping can be shown to be linear and hence T is a linear functional.
3. Let πi:Rn → R be the i-th projection mapping i.e. for any vector X = (a1, a2, ..... , an) ε Rn, πi = ai, the i-th coordinate of X. This mapping is linear and πi is a linear functional on Rn.
The domain V of a linear functional T: V → F can be either infinite dimensional or finite dimensional. We will consider here only linear functionals in which the domain V is finite dimensional.
Matrix representation of a linear functional whose domain is finite dimensional. Any linear mapping from one finite dimensional abstract vector space to another is represented by a matrix. A linear mapping from an n-dimensional vector space over a field F to an m-dimensional vector space over F is represented by an mxn matrix.over F. A linear functional T: V → F whose domain V is finite dimensional is a linear mapping from an n-dimensional vector space to a 1-dimensional vector space and is represented by a 1xn matrix i.e. an n-element row vector. The matrix representation of the mapping is
T(v) = Av
where v is an n-element coordinate vector and A is a 1xn matrix representation of T. Thus the linear functional has the form
or
T(v) = a1v1 + a2v2 + .... + anvn
Dual Space. If V is some abstract vector space over a field F, then the dual space of V is the vector space V* consisting of all linear functionals with domain V and range contained in F. The dual space V*, of a space V, is the vector space Hom (V,F). Linear functionals whose domain is finite dimensional and of dimension n are represented by 1xn matrices and dual space [ Hom (V,F) ] corresponds to the set of all 1xn matrices over F. If V is of dimension n then the dual space has dimension n.
Syn. conjugate space, adjoint space
Example. Let V be column space consisting of all n-element column vectors over R. Let
T: V → F be
T(v) = [a1, a2, .... , an] v
where a1, a2, .... , an are real numbers and v is any element in V. The row vector [a1, a2, .... , an] can be viewed as a linear operator operating on vectors in V. It is a linear functional which maps elements of V into field R. The dual space V* of V is then the vector space of all n-element row vectors. Thus row space is the dual space of column space V.
Basis for Dual Space. Suppose V is some abstract vector space of dimension n over a field F. Suppose {v1, v2, .... , vn} is a basis for V. Then a basis for the dual space V* of V is the set of n linear functionals f1, f2, .... , fn V* defined by
fi(vj) = 1 if i = j
fi(vj) = 0 if i ≠ j
where i = 1,n; j = 1,n. This is the Kronecker delta mapping
fi(vj) = δ(i,j)
where δ(i,j) is the Kronecker delta.
More explicitly, it is the following n mappings:
f1 mapping: v1 1, v2 0, v3 0, ..... , vn 0
f2 mapping: v1 0, v2 1, v3 0, ..... , vn 0
...........................................................................
fn mapping: v1 0, v2 0, v3 0, ..... , vn 1
The basis {f1, f2, .... , fn} is called the basis dual to {v1, v2, ..... , vn} or the dual basis. There are infinitely many possible bases for V and each basis has a dual basis as defined above.
See
Hom(V,W). Vector space of all mxn matrices.
Theorem 1. Let {v1, v2, ..... , vn} be a basis for V and let {f1, f2, .... , fn} be the basis of V* (i.e. dual basis). Then for any vector u V,
u = f1(u)v1 + f2(u)v2 + .... + fn(u)vn
and for any linear functional σ V*
σ = σ(v1)f1 + σ(v2)f2 + .... + σ(vn)fn
Thus we see that the coordinates of u are f1(u), f2(u), .... , fn(u) and the coordinates of σ
are σ(v1), σ(v2), .... , σ(vn) .
Annihilator. Let W be a subset (not necessarily a subspace) of a vector space V. A linear functional f V* is called an annihilator of W if f(w) = 0 for every w W. The set of all such mappings, denoted by W0 and called the annihilator of W, is a subspace of V*.
Example. Pass a line through the origin of an x-y-z Cartesian coordinate system and label it L. Let W be the set of all vectors in line L. Pass a plane through the origin of the coordinate system perpendicular to line L and label it K. Let S represent the set of all vectors in plane K. Then S is an annihilator of W. Why? If s is any vector in S and w is any vector in W then the dot product s∙w = 0. The vector s can be viewed as a linear operator (linear functional) mapping the vectors of W into the field of reals and it maps all the elements of W into zero. By the same logic W is an annihilator of S. So the annihilator W0 of W is the set S and the annihilator S0 of the set S is the set W.
Theorem 2. Suppose V has finite dimension and W is a subspace of V. Then
1) dimW + dim W0 = dim V
and
2) W00 = W
Transpose of a linear mapping. Let T:V → U be an arbitrary linear mapping from a vector space V into a vector space U. Now for any linear functional ω ε U*, the composition mapping ω T is a linear mapping from V into F. See Fig. 1. Thus ω T ε V*. We thus have a one-to-one correspondence between ω ε U* and ω T ε V*. The linear mapping
T t (ω) = ω T
that maps ω ε U* into ω T ε V* is called the transpose of T.
Thus [T t (ω)]v = ω(Tv) for every v ε V.
In summary, if T is a linear mapping from V into U, then T t is a linear mapping from U* into V*:
Theorem 3. Let T:V → U be linear, and let A be the matrix representation of T relative to bases {vi} of V and {ui} of U. Then the transpose matrix At is the matrix representation of T t:U* → V* relative to the bases dual to {ui} and {vi}.
References
Lipschutz. Linear Algebra. p. 249-251
Taylor. Introduction to Functional Analysis. p. 33
Jesus Christ and His Teachings
Way of enlightenment, wisdom, and understanding
America, a corrupt, depraved, shameless country
On integrity and the lack of it
The test of a person's Christianity is what he is
Ninety five percent of the problems that most people have come from personal foolishness
Liberalism, socialism and the modern welfare state
The desire to harm, a motivation for conduct
On Self-sufficient Country Living, Homesteading
Topically Arranged Proverbs, Precepts, Quotations. Common Sayings. Poor Richard's Almanac.
Theory on the Formation of Character
People are like radio tuners --- they pick out and listen to one wavelength and ignore the rest
Cause of Character Traits --- According to Aristotle
We are what we eat --- living under the discipline of a diet
Avoiding problems and trouble in life
Role of habit in formation of character
Personal attributes of the true Christian
What determines a person's character?
Love of God and love of virtue are closely united
Intellectual disparities among people and the power in good habits
Tools of Satan. Tactics and Tricks used by the Devil.
The Natural Way -- The Unnatural Way
Wisdom, Reason and Virtue are closely related
Knowledge is one thing, wisdom is another
My views on Christianity in America
The most important thing in life is understanding
We are all examples --- for good or for bad
Television --- spiritual poison
The Prime Mover that decides "What We Are"
Where do our outlooks, attitudes and values come from?
Sin is serious business. The punishment for it is real. Hell is real.
Self-imposed discipline and regimentation
Achieving happiness in life --- a matter of the right strategies
Self-control, self-restraint, self-discipline basic to so much in life