SolitaryRoad.com

Website owner:  James Miller


[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]

On homosexuality


   God is generally restrained in dealing with the wicked.  He is 
   long-suffering and patient.  He is slow to anger.  He "sends 
   his rain on the just and the unjust".  He lets the tares grow 
   with the wheat until the day of harvest when they will be 
   separated.  However, the Bible does record instances when sin 
   on the earth was so gross and shocking that God was not able to 
   contain his anger.  One of the most notable instances of this 
   concerned two cities --- Sodom and Gomorrah.  He was so 
   outraged over the grossness and shocking nature of their sin 
   that he utterly destroyed them with fire and brimstone rained 
   down from heaven.  What was this sin that so outraged him?  
   Homosexuality. See Genesis 18:20-33; 19:1-28.

   Today homosexuality is rampant in our land.  And our government 
   not only condones it but supports the homosexuals in their 
   demands for acceptance.  Even our school children are being 
   taught that homosexuality is OK and acceptable; that they 
   should accept it as just another way, a way equally as good and 
   right as heterosexuality.

   Homosexuality is grossly immoral; it is wickedness of the 
   highest order.  It is behavior to shock and outrage any  
   decent, right-thinking person.  

   To me I live in a topsy-turvy, Alice-in-Wonderland society, a 
   society gone crazy, a society that has lost its reason, its 
   sense, its knowledge of right and wrong.  It is a society where 
   good, decent people are vilified by tagging them as bigots and 
   evil, wicked people are glamorized and set up as models, a 
   society where Wickedness is exalted and Goodness is trampled.  
   It is a society where there has occurred a terrible 
   transposition --- where right is wrong and wrong is right.

   Isa. 5:20  Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil; that
   put darkness for light and light for darkness; that put bitter for 
   sweet and sweet for bitter!   Isa. 5:20

   Isa 3:9 The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; 
   and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto
   their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves. (10) Say 
   ye to the righteous, that it shall be well with him: for they 
   shall eat the fruit of their doings. (11) Woe unto the wicked! 
   it shall be ill with him: for the reward of his hands shall be 
   given him. 

   When God gave his commandments to the Children of Israel his 
   position on homosexuality was crystal clear:

   Lev 18:22,24  You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It 
   is an abomination.  Do not defile yourselves with any of these 
   things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am 
   casting out before you. 

   Lev 20:13  If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, 
   both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely 
   be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. 

   The attitude of Christianity is the same as that of the Old 
   Testament, completely unequivocal on the subject: 

   Rom 1:26-28  For this cause God gave them up unto vile 
   affections: for even their women did change the natural use 
   into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, 
   leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one 
   toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, 
   and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error 
   which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in 
   their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do 
   those things which are not convenient; 

   Jude 7  ... as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them 
   in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to 
   sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth 
   as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

   1 Cor 6:9-10   Do you not know that the unrighteous will not 
   inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither 
   fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, 
   nor sodomites, {10} nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, 
   nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. 

   In the Bible homosexuality is not just another sin.  It holds a 
   special place among sins.  It is a sin of sins, a sin dwarfing 
   other sins in its grossness, its depth of moral depravity, its 
   wickedness.  So how did we get to where we are today, where  a 
   sin so gross as homosexuality is accepted by so many people as 
   OK, as just another lifestyle, equally as valid as the 
   heterosexual lifestyle?  Well, we can thank the psychiatrists 
   and psychologists for that.  An association of psychiatrists or 
   psychologists determined several decades ago that homosexuality 
   was something a person was born with, something they couldn't 
   help.  Some people, they said, were just born with a homosexual 
   orientation or inclination while others weren't.  That suddenly 
   became their position on the subject (a determination perhaps 
   influenced by prominant homosexual researchers --- Alfred 
   Kinsey was a homosexual, as have been a number of researchers).  
   So immediately the following question arises:  Can we consider 
   homosexual conduct a sin if some people are born with a 
   homosexual inclination while others aren't?  Going from there, 
   the Bible has been considered discredited and people conclude 
   there is nothing wrong with homosexuality, its conduct or 
   lifestyle.  The Bible has again been discredited by "science".  
   Science is king in our modern world.  We are now in the 
   enlightened age.  Well, I don't accept their premise that some 
   people are just born that way and others aren't.  I suspect 
   everyone may be born with homosexual potential and that 
   homosexuality is just like other sins, people are enticed into 
   it in some way, introduced into it, and then find themselves 
   caught in a trap from which they are unable to extract 
   themselves (like a fly caught in a spider's web).  They may 
   indeed have trouble getting out of the trap, but that doesn't 
   mean they were born homosexuals.  We live in a world of Satanic 
   lie, of high deceit and deception, of gross dishonesty.  The 
   Devil has the masses fooled in every way, all the time.  He and 
   his helpers, that is.  So now school children are being 
   indoctrinated by our society, being told that homosexuality is 
   just another lifestyle and should be accepted.  The homosexuals 
   and atheists have a lot of power and influence in our society, 
   especially through organizations such as the ACLU and various 
   homosexual organizations.  They are pushing their agendas 
   everywhere.  They hate the Bible and Christianity with a 
   passion.  They have government, the mass media, liberal 
   religion, the educational system, etc. all on their side.  
   Corporations are joining in droves.  So now the homosexuals 
   have turned the tables on the Christian.  The Christian is now 
   a bigot and a bad person, someone to be despised.  Everywhere 
   laws are being made intended to intimidate and silence him.  A 
   Christian dare not speak the truth for fear of being kicked out 
   of school or losing his job.  To tell the truth about 
   homosexuality is hate speach.  To quote scripture on 
   homosexuality is hate speach.  To not accept homosexuality and 
   its lifestyle is hateful and unacceptable.  There is a whole 
   lot of anti-Christian climate in this country.  Especially in 
   our educational system.  They are working on our youth.  Very 
   sad.  Now Satan owns the roost.  You live by his rules.

   The wicked plots against the just,
    And gnashes at him with his teeth.

                               Psalm 37:12

   We live in a land of liberty and freedom.  Freedom for the 
   godless, immoral and wicked, that is.  Freedom to celebrate 
   every kind of depraved, degenerate conduct.  Freedom for the 
   wicked to say whatever they wish.  Freedom for the wicked to be 
   as wicked as they wish.  Consider the depths of depravity of 
   what is now being shown on television.  Every year the limits 
   are pushed further and further.  A step at a time, step by 
   step, the public is desensitized and conditioned towards deeper 
   and deeper depravity.  There is no end.  It is a bottomless 
   abyss.  The freedom for the wicked is unlimited.  But it is a 
   one way street.  For the good and moral it is another story.  
   They keep their mouths shut if they don't want to be sued, 
   kicked out of school or be fired from their jobs.  Their 
   opinion isn't wanted.  They dare not say what they think or 
   feel.  It is just the way the laws are written.  For some 
   reason the laws always seem to favor the wicked.  And if it is 
   not the laws coming out of Congress, it is our constitution.  
   The constitution always seems to be on the side of the wicked.  
   And the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) is always right 
   there to protect all the rights of the wicked.

   Do you know what this reminds me of?  It all reminds me of the 
   story in Genesis about that righteous man Lot living in the 
   city of Sodom.  It was a rich, wealthy city and Lot chose to 
   live there because he liked the easy city life.  He lived 
   there, observed all their depravity, and kept his mouth shut. 

   Today there are countries, Canada for instance, that have "hate 
   speech" laws and where simply to quote passages from the Bible on 
   the topic of homosexuality is a national crime with severe 
   penalty.  Quoting the Bible on the topic of homosexuality is 
   legally interpreted as constituting "hate speech", thus 
   intimidating and silencing the Christian.  This is liberalism, 
   progressiveism at its best.  I believe this is America's future.  
   I think it lies just a little bit down the road. 

   They are after our children.  I have no children.  I am very 
   happy about that.


   Feb 1996


 

   ------------------------------------

   Addendum,  17 July 2010

   The following news article just appeared on the internet.  It 
   is about a controversy that has been in the national news for 
   the last couple of days. 

   Mont. sex-ed controversy could open parents' eyes 
   By Michael Foust 
   Jul 16, 2010 


   HELENA, Mont. (BP)--A controversy over proposed sex-ed 
   curriculum in Helena, Mont., for students as young as 
   kindergarten should lead parents elsewhere to be more in tune 
   with what their schools are teaching, an expert on the topic 
   says. 

   The proposal, which has drawn nationwide attention, attracted 
   an overflow crowd at the Helena School Board Meeting July 14, 
   when more than 300 people attended, although the board had time 
   to hear from only 64. It could take a vote next month on 
   whether to approve the curriculum. 

   Among the more controversial elements, the proposal says 
   kindergarteners would learn the "basic reproductive body parts 
   (penis, vagina, breast, nipples, testicles, scrotum, uterus)" 
   and first-graders would learn "human beings can love people of 
   the same gender & people of another gender." Fifth-graders 
   would learn that "sexual intercourse includes but is not 
   limited to vaginal, oral, or anal penetration" and seventh-
   graders would learn about Supreme Court opinions on abortion 
   and "reproductive health." 

   It's at least the second controversy over public school sex-ed 
   in recent weeks that has made the national news. In June the 
   school board of Provincetown, Mass., adopted a policy to make 
   condoms available to all students -- without parental consent -
   - and did not set an age or grade limit. Several weeks later 
   the board amended the policy so that it's "age-appropriate" and 
   dependent on "specific circumstances," although parents still 
   will not be notified. 

   Chad Hills, an analyst for sexual health with CitizenLink, an 
   arm of Focus on the Family, said parents in both communities 
   have plenty of reasons to be upset. 

   "Parents are the primary teachers of sexuality to their 
   children," Hills told Baptist Press. "This is not an issue that 
   is without morals, without values. This issue is highly 
   specific to families, and it's not the school's place to impart 
   values and morals to the children. It's the parents' place to 
   do that. The school is there to educate them in English, math. 
   Parents should be outraged." 

   Hills added, "Parents should be neck-deep in what their schools 
   are teaching their kids, especially in science class or 
   physical education class, where sex-education is typically 
   taught. Parents need to attend board meetings. Parents need to 
   be involved in local elections of the offices within their 
   schools." 

   Among the other controversial elements of the Helen, Mont., 
   policy: 

   -- Kindergarteners would learn "a baby grows in a woman's 
   uterus." 

   -- Third-graders would learn "the ovary produces eggs and the 
   testicles produce sperm." 

   -- Fifth-graders would learn that "sexual orientation refers to 
   a person's physical and/or romantic attraction to an individual 
   of the same and/or different gender, and is one part of one's 
   personality." 

   -- Sixth-graders would learn that "the penis, fingers, tongue 
   or objects" can be used in sex. They would also learn that 
   "gender identity is different from sexual orientation." 

   -- Beginning with seventh-graders, students would discuss 
   Supreme Court decisions that have given people "the right to 
   make personal decisions concerning sexuality & reproductive 
   health matters, such as abortion, sterilization, and 
   contraception." 

   -- Ninth-graders would begin learning that "erotic images in 
   art reflect society's views about sexuality & help people 
   understand sexuality." 

   Parents would have the opportunity to opt out of the 
   curriculum, but some parents say that's not sufficient. 

   "Much of this information is weaved into curriculums other than 
   sexual [education]," Mikal Wilkerson, a parent who attended the 
   board meeting, said on FoxNews' "Hannity" program. "So even if 
   I opt my child out of the sexual [education], they will still 
   receive much of this information in other curriculums. In 
   addition, if my child goes out to recess, you know they're 
   going to hear it from the kids. Now it's even in a different 
   context." 

   The sex-ed curriculum, Wilkerson said, puts the child "in the 
   middle" of the controversy. 

   "The school teaches one set of values," she said. "I teach 
   another set of values. And now the kid's stuck right at the 
   middle. And it undermines the authority of both the parent and 
   the teacher in the school." 

   Supporters of the curriculum say it is needed because children 
   and young teens already are having sex. It will help cut down 
   on teen pregnancy and STDs, they say. Hills, of CitizenLink, 
   says supporters are off the mark. 

   "My answer for that is that the school nurse should not be 
   handing out condoms," Hills said. "Instead, the school nurse 
   should be sitting down with these kids, in the same room with 
   their guardian or their parent, and saying, 'Look, this is not 
   a healthy direction for you to be traveling. Here are the 
   potential outcomes if this behavior continues in your life.'" 

   A handful of organizations, Hills said, are promoting similar 
   sex-ed program nationwide. Among them are Planned Parenthood, 
   SIECUS (Sexuality Information and Education Council of the 
   United States) and Advocates for Youth (AFY). The controversy 
   will be "coming down the pike" in a "lot more states," he said. 

   "There's such a thing as awakening passions before their time," 
   Hills said. "This is exactly what these types of groups do, 
   because they're focusing on sexuality. Many teens are pursuing 
   sex instead of relationships. And a lot of the college students 
   are beginning to rebel against that because they're saying, 
   'There is no lasting satisfaction in that. There's only 
   temporary pleasure and there's this hollow emptiness left 
   inside of me after that experience.' 

   "What they're beginning to realize -- without even being told 
   this -- is that sex has context, and that context is within the 
   stable lifelong commitment of marriage between one man and one 
   woman, the way God designed it to be."

   Michael Foust is an assistant editor of Baptist Press.

   Read the curriculum online at
 http://www.helena.k12.mt.us/images/documents/curriculum/HealthCurriculum/K12FinalHealth.pdf. 

         � Copyright 2010 Baptist Press 
         Original copy of this story can be found at 
         http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=33363 


   The supporters of the above proposal say, "This is about truth 
   and reality so the kids don't grow up in La-La Land."  I ask, 
   "What is this La-La Land they speak of?"  It is Christian 
   morality.  It is Christian outlook, values and standards.  What 
   is this "truth and reality" they speak of?  Their truth and 
   reality is uninhibited sex of every type, shape and form --- 
   same sex relationships, multi-partner sex, whatever.  It is 
   what a Christian would view as animal depravity of the grossest 
   type.  It is human nature at its very lowest.

   A pro-homosexual, anti-Christian, liberal, intellectual elite 
   is trying to force its outlooks, attitudes, values and ways on 
   America.  An elite clique graduated from our elite schools and 
   universities is trying to replace Christianity with its own 
   "higher" morality (a moral outlook that is really nothing more 
   than an elaborate rationalization for gross immorality and not 
   holding up to very high standards of logic).  It pushes an 
   agenda aimed at reshaping modern society into its own outlooks 
   and values, of re-engineering America into its own image.  And 
   slowly, set by step, it is succeeding.  People complain and 
   object, but then they give up and accept it.  Under constant 
   bombardment of moral lie, the masses finally follow like sheep.  
   A new religion is being preached and the masses slowly follow.  
   You never hear a congressman or person of high position 
   criticizing homosexuality.  No official in a high position ever 
   speaks against it.  It is just not socially nor politically 
   acceptable to do it.  That is the reality.  Even if people view 
   it as wrong, they don't have the courage to speak up.  They 
   have been cowed into silence.  No one wants to be labeled a 
   bigot or a radical. 

   Today homosexual "couples" are being allowed to adopt children.
   How shocking! What has this society come to?  What an unspeakable 
   crime is being commited against these innocent children!  The 
   children are being sold to Satan himself!


   July 2010



More from SolitaryRoad.com:
Similarities between America and the ancient city of Sodom

On modern intellectualism

The new religion of the new America

America, the wicked, shameless land

America has fallen into a great night. The light of Christianity has receded and the darkness of Satan has fallen over the land.

Our immoral society

Liberalism is evil

The age-old conflict between Good and Evil. The philosophy of tolerance. Immorality in America.

Satanic Lie and Delusion --- Apostate Christianity

A Strategy Meeting at Satan's Headquarters

Inhibitions --- modern society's fight against them

Psychology and psychiatry --- so dangerous because they stand as competing authorities with the Bible

Americans --- What they are is revealed by their tastes

Moral perversion comes in steps

American moral corruption, the end product of liberal social thought

America

America --- A Society that has lost its Spiritual Moorings

A horse is a horse

Social justice

The healthy society

Homosexuality in America


[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]