Alfred Kinsey, father of the great sexual revolution

SolitaryRoad.com

Website owner:  James Miller

[ Home ] [ Up ] [ Info ] [ Mail ]

Most agree that that great sexual revolution that occurred in the USA in the 1960's and spread out to the rest of the world was triggered by Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). These books were publications of what were supposedly scientific studies on human sexuality. Because of the prestige with which science is held, the conclusions put forward by Kinsey were accepted by large portions of the population as fact. Just how scientific were these studies that Kinsey carried out? There is a lady who has been claiming for many years that the science was bogus, manipulated science produced by a highly unethical person pushing a personal and cultural agenda. The lady’s name is Dr. Judith Reisman. She is a professor, researcher and author of a number of articles and books about him including Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences and Sexual Sabotage.She has been a scientific consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and is listed in Who's Who in Science & Engineering, International Who's Who in Sexology, International Who's Who in Education, Who's Who of American Women, The World's Who's Who of Women, etc. Based on her work, The German Medical Tribune and the British medical journal, The Lancet demanded that the Kinsey Institute be investigated for deliberately covering up massive sex crimes against children and fraudulent science. Her website can be found at http://www.drjudithreisman.com/ . It is a huge information resource on the subject with multitudes of links.

What kind of person was Kinsey? He was an atheist and sex pervert. He had sexual relations with some of his male staff as well as heterosexual affairs with women and encouraged both his staff and his wife to do the same. He set up a bed and camera in the attic of his house and filmed hundreds of sexual encounters. He was obsessed with sex, including masochistic sex.

In his publications he presented tables that purported to demonstrate that children are sexual from birth and are capable of enjoying sexual stimulation even at five months of age. The tables contain information on children as young as two months old. He reports the children initially reacting to the sexual experimentation by “screaming, writhing and falling down in pain”. How did he obtain this information? Where did his data come from? It seems that he enlisted pedophiles to help him in his “scientific research”. They conducted their “experiments” on these young children and reported back to him. Apparently most of his information came from one very practiced and prolific pedofile named Rex King, although he attempted to make it appear that it had come from a number of sources. Because the questionnaires he used would have been insulting to most people at that time, most normal people would not participate in his studies and so he relied on sex perverts, prostitutes, criminals and such for most of his data. The data hardly represented an unbiased cross-section of humanity. He hated Christianity and its stance on sex and produced “scientific” results that had the effect of justifying his own perverted inclinations i.e proving everyone was as perverted as he.

Tim A. Meshginpoosh wrote in June 25, 1998:

If Congress does not pursue an investigation of the Kinsey Institute, then they should call off the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky investigations. Dr. Judith Reisman has meticulously exposed this saddest chapter in American academic history in her new book Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences. While Hitler and his ilk were torturing Jewish children in sadistic medical experiments, former Indiana University zoology professor Alfred Kinsey did the same thing to over hundreds of American children, at taxpayer expense.

While former Kinsey co-researchers Wardell Pomeroy and Paul Gebhard attempt to put a positive spin on Kinsey, Reisman exposes him for who he was: a fraudulent scientist obsessed with adultery, homosexuality, sadomasochism, and compulsive masturbation. His research was shoddy at best and criminal at worst.

Read the rest of Tim’s article at Kinsey, Crimes and Consequences.

And for more information see also 2400 Lawmakers warn of Kinsey influence .

Kinsey claimed that children were sexual from birth. What can one say on this subject? I can say that for myself I never experienced any sexual desires until the age of puberty, around 12 years of age. I suspect that what was true for me is true for most people. If it were not true, young pre-adolescent children would be having sex with each other. That doesn’t happen to my knowledge. However, it does appear that a person who knows what he is doing (i.e. a pedofile) can awaken sexual feeling in young children and sexually pervert them by molesting them. Is this not something that was known before the time of Kinsey? Kinsey simply showed what could be accomplished in the way of sexually perverting children. To me, molesting a child is a crime of gigantic proportions. It is an enormous, unforgivable crime against the child. I feel the punishment for such a crime should be extremely severe. Like the death penalty. Public hanging would probably reduce the rate for that crime substantially.

Although I would say that the Kinsey reports triggered the great sexual revolution, I would hesitate in calling them the cause. Involved was moral degeneracy in the liberal, atheistic elite class. The report fell on the ears of a class looking for something like this. It provided “scientific” backing for their immoral outlooks. It was a thing that they wanted to hear and they grabbed it and played it for all it was worth. They didn’t care about how good the science behind it was. It provided the moral license they wanted. And a generation of youth devoid of moral foundation drank it up with gusto. Had the report fallen on the ears of a country with a good solid moral foundation it wouldn’t have been believed or accepted. Anyone with good sense would have questioned the reports immediately. At bottom the question is all a moral one. Moral truth cannot be obtained through science. Just as something as simple as a sound can trigger a great avalanche, the Kinsey reports triggered a sexual revolution. The universities and mass media played a big role in the whole thing, I am sure. Thus the moral foundations of a once great country disintegrated into dust.

Aug 2011